By Victoria Nwankwo, 2025/2026 Power in Place Research Collaborator
Charlotte E. Ray stepped into the legal world at a time when Black women’s ideas, labor, and leadership were rarely taken seriously by the institutions that claimed to uphold justice. Born in 1850 to an abolitionist family in New York City, she grew up surrounded by people who believed deeply in education and collective freedom. Her father edited The Colored American, and her home was filled with books, debate, and a belief that Black people deserved full participation in American life. When she entered Howard University’s law program using the initials C. E. Ray, she did it to avoid the gender bias that would have blocked her admission. In doing so, she was pushing against a legal order that had already decided someone like her did not belong. By the time she was admitted to the D.C. Bar in 1872, she had forced the profession to confront its own boundaries. Ray’s time at Howard shows how her studies became the foundation of her legal career and shaped the way she approached the profession. She studied classical languages and commercial law, not simply to earn a degree but to counter the widespread belief that Black women were not capable of mastering the law. That kind of expectation has not disappeared. In a profession where, currently, only two percent of attorneys in the United States are Black women, the message is clear. The problem is not talent or drive, but access, resources, and a long history of institutions that were never built for them in the first place. Excellence becomes a condition of survival, not a mark of privilege. Ray’s achievements remind us that education can open doors, but it cannot, on its own, undo the bias that controls who gets to stay in the room once they enter it. The conclusion of Ray’s legal career makes clear that simply gaining access did not guarantee real opportunity or acceptance in the profession she fought so hard to enter. Eventually, the weight of that reality pushed her out of the profession. Her departure cannot be viewed as failure of ambition. It was a clear reflection of a system that created the appearance of opportunity while quietly shutting her out. Many Black women in law still describe similar experiences. Feelings such as burnout, isolation, and lack of mentorship continue to push talented women out of the field. Ray’s story is an early version of a pattern that has not fully changed. Institutions often protect themselves by exhausting the people who challenge long-standing norms. Looking at Ray today opens up a sense of possibility, especially for young Black women interested in law. Representation alone is not everything, but seeing someone who navigated obstacles this heavy makes the path feel a little more real. Her story strengthens the belief that Black women have always had the knowledge and skill to shape the law, even when they were denied the chance to practice it fully. Learning about her journey has shaped how I view my own. It gives me a stronger sense of belonging in a field that still struggles to welcome people who look like me. As a young Black woman preparing for a career in law, Ray’s story stays with me. It motivates me, but it also grounds me. It reminds me that the work ahead is not just about personal success. It is about shifting conditions that have kept Black women on the outside for generations. Ray’s courage and frustrations both matter, as they show what real progress requires and what it costs. Her legacy stretches into present-day struggles for justice. She practiced law during a time when the rights of Black people were constantly under attack. Today, questions about who gets to participate fully in American life remain contested, whether through voter suppression, debates over affirmative action, or disparities in legal representation. Black women continue to do the work of pushing this country toward the ideals it claims to stand for. Ray’s commitment to equality, even after she left the courtroom, shows that shaping the law does not only happen inside legal institutions. It happens through teaching, organizing, writing, and refusing to disappear. Charlotte E. Ray’s story is a reminder that the history of American law is also a history of exclusion. She represents what is possible, but she also forces us to acknowledge what remains unresolved. To study her is to recognize both the breakthroughs and the barriers. The path she opened is still unfolding, carried forward by Black women determined to practice the law, question it, and transform it.
References
American Bar Association. “Profile of the Legal Profession: Demographics.” ABA, 2023. https://www.americanbar.org/news/profile-legal-profession/demographics/ Biography.com Editors. “Charlotte E. Ray.” Biography.com. Archived January 18, 2016. https://web.archive.org/web/20160118213217/http:/www.biography.com/news/charlotte-e-ray-biography-facts Legally BLK Fund. “Our Mission.” https://www.legallyblkfund.org/mission Smith, J. Clay Jr. Emancipation: The Making of the Black Lawyer, 1844–1944. University of Pennsylvania Press, 1993. Wikipedia Contributors. “New National Era.” Wikipedia. Accessed November 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_National_Era BlackPast.org. “Charlotte E. Ray (1850–1911).” https://blackpast.org/african-american-history/ray-charlotte-e-1850-1911/ History with the Szilagyis. “Charlotte E. Ray.” https://historywiththeszilagyis.org/hwts244
Victoria Nwankwo is a sophomore at Emory University majoring in Sociology and African American Studies. She is interested in law, racial equity, and the history of Black women’s leadership. Victoria’s work on this project deepened her interest in how race and power shape access to legal and educational institutions. She is involved in community-centered advocacy and youth engagement efforts and enjoys researching the stories of Black women whose work has often gone unrecognized. After college, she hopes to pursue a career in law where she can help expand access and opportunity for marginalized communities
.
.
